Lixiu Guan,1 Guifeng Chen,2 Xiaolin Song,2 Hong Wang,2 Junguang Tao2*
1School of Science, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
2Key Lab. for New Type of Functional Materials in Hebei Province, School of Materials Science and Engineering,
Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
Proceedings of the Nature Research Society, 2017, 1, 01007
Published Online: 26 October 2017 (Article)
Citation Information: Lixiu Guan, Guifeng Chen, Xiaolin Song, Hong Wang, Junguang Tao, Synergistic effect of MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures with enhanced photo- and electro-catalytic performance , Proceedings of the Nature Research Society, 2017, 1, 01007. doi: 10.11605/j.pnrs.201701007
Received: 15 May 2017, Accepted: 19 October 2017, Published Online: 26 October 2017
Herein, different MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures are prepared with appropriate interface modifications. Electronic structure analysis shows that type II band alignments are realized at the interface, which efficiently drives the photo-excited charge to separate. Moreover, the band offsets can be delicately controlled by surface states with significant effect on their photocatalytic performance. In addition, the synergistic effect between MoS2 and TiO2 enhances the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity of their hybrids which is tunable via interface engineering. The observed Tafel slop of 66.9 mV/dec for MoS2/TiO2-H complexes suggests the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism. The enhanced activities was attributed to the abundant active sites at the interfaces as well as the improved charge transfer efficiency.
TiO2 is one of the most intensively studied photochemical materials with wide applications in environmental protection and green energy [1,2]. However, because of its large intrinsic band-gap, it is only sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) light and inefficient for solar light harvesting. To go beyond this, strategies such as foreign elementals doing and formation of TiO2 based heterostructures have been employed to broaden their light harvesting window into visible light range [3,4]. More recently, it was realized that electronic behaviors in surface layers play significant roles to photocatalytic performance and thus surface functionalization is substantial in the quest of visible light photocatalysis [4-7]. This offers new ideas for designing visible light photocatalysis via engineering the surface layer only.
On the other hand, owing to its great potentials in areas of photo-detection , photocatalysis , nanoelectronics , and optoelectronics , two dimensional (2D) molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has become widely studied functional material. With the appropriate band gap energy and high light absorption, MoS2 could be suitable for applications in effective photovoltaic and photocatalysts under visible light. Coupling two materials to form one with novel functionalities has become a common method in material science studies. The function of MoS2 in MoS2/TiO2 complexes is an effective sensitizer for enhanced production of hydrogen [12-14]. However, MoS2 tends to form irregular aggregates of nanoparticles or stacked multilayers without strong chemical bonding with the substrates especially for its (001) planes where intrinsic van der Waals forces govern the interlayer interactions, which, in most of the time, disfavors charge transfer at the interface. For a given heterostructure system, interface band alignment is substantial to the electron-hole separation which is desired to be tunable in manners to enhance charge separation efficiency. In previous study , it has been shown that type II band alignment is formed between MoS2 thin film and single crystal rutile TiO2. Recently, there are a few reports on synthesized MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures [16-23] with improved photocatalytic performance, which show that surface modifications of TiO2 are generally needed to create more nucleation centers in order to form solid interfacial bonding . However, the insight of this growth mechanisms and how the interface properties affect their growth behaviors and modulate the electronic structure are yet to be understood. Moreover, since MoS2 layer is atomically thin, interfacial interaction are markedly pronounced in certain scenarios with strong effect on their charge transport properties .
Up to now, the most efficient hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalysts contain scarce Pt-group metals, which catalyze HER with almost zero overpotential. Recently, MoS2 was found to be good HER catalyst and believed to hold strong promise for replacing Pt-based catalysts [24-27]. However, the low active sites and poor conductivity of pristine MoS2 limit its electrocatalytic abilities . Both experimental and theoretical work confirms that the HER activity of MoS2 is strongly correlated with unsaturated S atoms along Mo-edges and defects in MoS2 nanosheets [28-31]. However, the nano-sized MoS2 with unsaturated edges sites are thermodynamically unstable and easy to curl up. The formation of MoS2-based hybrid structures is one of the easy way to cover this issue. The key challenge for MoS2-based complexes in the HER lies in accelerating electron transfer while maintaining rich active sites. This requires the control and design of interfacial properties to regulate interfacial band alignment for fast charge transfer. For a given heterostructure system, interface band alignment is substantial to the electron-hole separation. Therefore, the effect of interfacial band alignment on their HER performance requires urgent study.
In this work, MoS2/TiO2 hybrid complexes with various purposely modified interfaces have been successfully prepared. Type-II band alignment are formed in all cases making conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) occurred in different semiconductors. The VBM of MoS2 was pushed up against that of TiO2 on sulfuric acid (H2SO4) treated nanobelts. In addition, we found that sulfuric acid (H2SO4) treated samples exhibit much more enhanced HER activity which emphasizes the important roles that the interfacial build-in electric field plays for efficient electron transfer.
Rough surface of TiO2 nanobelts and the corresponding MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures were fabricated by hydrothermal methods. Briefly, 0.1 g TiO2 powder (P25) was mixed with 15 ml of 10 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution and 15 ml deionized (DI) water. After stirring, the solution was transferred into a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave followed by hydrothermal treatment at 210 oC for 24 h. The white fluffy product was washed with DI water and 0.1 M HCl solution to get H-titanate nanobelts which was decomposed into TiO2 nanobelts by annealing in O2 (50 sccm) at 700 oC for 1 h. To increase the surface nucleation sites, the TiO2 surfaces were treated with a combination of base and acid etching in three different manners: 1) Etching in 40 ml NaOH at 150 oC for 4h, followed by 0.1 M HCl for 3 h, labeled as TiO2-NH thereafter; 2) Etching in 40 ml 0.02 M H2SO4 solution at 100 oC for 12 h, labeled as TiO2-H thereafter; 3) Combination of steps 1) and 2) in sequence, labeled as TiO2-NHH thereafter. To get MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures, the mixture of 30 mg sodium molybdate (Na2MoO4·2H2O) and 60 mg thioacetamide (C2H5NS) was stirred in 30 ml DI water to form uniform and transparent solution. Then 20 mg different surface-modified TiO2 powders were added and the mixture was transferred into Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was sealed and maintained at 220 oC for 24 h. The black product, MoS2/TiO2 complex, was obtained after separation and drying.
The structure phase of MoS2/TiO2 hybrids were characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 FOCUS). The morphology of the powders were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Nova Nano SEM450) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL 200 kV). The x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using VG ESCALAB 220i-XL instrument equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.7 eV) x-ray source. All spectra were recorded in the constant pass energy mode with pass energy of 20 eV and step width of 0.1 eV. The electrochemical performance were tested in a three-electrode system (LK2010A) in 0.5 M H2SO4 using a Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) reference electrode, a Pt counter electrode and glassy carbon (GC, 3 mm in diameter) electrode loaded with various catalysts as the working electrode. All the polarization curves were plotted after IR-correction.
Results and discussion
In order to examine the crystal phase of the TiO2 nanobelts and MoS2/TiO2, XRD measurements are employed on as-prepared TiO2, post-treated TiO2 nanobelts, MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures and pure MoS2 flowers. As presented in Figure 1(a)-(b), the detected diffraction patterns at 25.44o, 37.84o and 48.12o match well with the (101), (004) and (200) peaks of standard anatase TiO2 phase (JCPDS card No. 21-1272) without any other impurities for both as-prepared and post-treated TiO2 nanobelts. No other phases such as rutile TiO2 or Na2Ti3O7 are detectable. These results indicate that the surface modifications do not destroy the composition and nature of the materials. After the growth of MoS2, additional peaks at 14.38o, 33.40o and 58.90o show up which are assigned to (002), (100) and (110) diffraction patterns in hexagonal phase MoS2 (a = b = 0.316 nm, c = 1.230 nm, JCPDS card No. 37-1492) . The TiO2 diffraction peaks remain sharp after the formation of MoS2/TiO2 hybrid complexes suggesting good crystalline of TiO2. By calculating the full width at half maximum (FWHM) value of the (002) diffraction peak using Scherrer equation, the thickness of MoS2 sheet along the c axis was estimated to be 7.2 nm, or ~10 layers.
Figure 1. XRD pattern of as-prepared (a) and post-treated TiO2 nanobelts (b). (c) is the XRD pattern of MoS2/TiO2. (d) is XRD pattern of pure MoS2 flowers.
The morphology and size of TiO2 nanobelts are characterized by SEM, which reveals the difference for various treatments. Figure 2(a) presents SEM image of the as-prepared TiO2 nanobelts, which are about 50-70 nm thick and several micrometers long. The surface of the as-prepared TiO2 nanobelts is smooth and uniform. Therefore, MoS2 can barely grow on the untreated TiO2 surface. In a separated experiment, our method can prepare nicely ordered MoS2 flower, as shown in Figure 2(b). In Figure 2(c), 2(e) and 2(g), the SEM images of post-treated TiO2 nanobelts are given as well as their composites with MoS2 in Figure 2(d), 2(f) and 2(h). The geometry structure of the post-treated TiO2 nanobelts is more or less the same after different surface etching treatments. After the surface etching treatment, the TiO2 nanobelts were cracked into thicker (60-200 nm) and rougher ones. However, their surface roughness is strongly modified upon different acid and base treatments. From Figure 2, one can see that H2SO4 treatment exhibits more influence on the surface morphologies. For the samples experienced H2SO4 treatments, see Figure 2(e), their surfaces become rough and decorated. In Figure 2(f), there exists some small particles and porous features evenly distributed on the surface of nanobelts, which is consistent with previous observations . The surface modification of TiO2 provides more nucleation sites for the growth of MoS2 nanosheets . As shown clearly, the surface engineering can create more nucleation sites which (1) provides more adsorption sites for MoS2 to land on; (2) facilitates the formation of defect-rich MoS2 structures. Therefore, it is expected that MoS2 nanostructures grown on these treated TiO2 nanobelts would favor the HER electrochemical catalysis. One should note that although the SEM image of TiO2-NH shows relative smoother surface, its surface nucleation sites has already formed at nanoscale which will be discussed later. In general, both acid or base treatment results in the formation of dangling bond for the growth of MoS2 . In comparison, NaOH/HCl can rough the surface in nanoscale while H2SO4 solution peels off the surface structure to form microscale structures. As shown, the surface morphologies of different post-treated TiO2 nanobelts are strongly distinguishable which are expected to exhibit different catalytic performance for their MoS2/TiO2 hybrid complexes. Either the base or acid treatments leads to the formation of dangling bond acting as growth nucleation sites.
Figure 2. SEM images of TiO2 nanobelts (a), and MoS2 flowers (b). (c), (e) and (g) are TiO2 nanobelts with different surface post-treatments: (c) TiO2-NH, (e) TiO2-NHH, and (f) TiO2-H. (d), (f) and (h) are MoS2/TiO2 complex for (d) TiO2-NH, (f) TiO2-NHH, and (g) TiO2-H.
Bright field cross-section TEM images are given in Figure 3 for MoS2/TiO2 hybrid heterostructures with different post-treated interfaces, where both MoS2 nanoflowers and nanosheets can be observed to decorate the surface of TiO2 nanobelts. As shown in Figure 3, the TiO2 nanobelts penetrate through MoS2 nanoflowers regardless of the surface post-treatment methods. The surface of modified TiO2-NH nanobelts are relatively smoother while H2SO4-treated surface possesses more particle and pore features, which is consistent with the SEM results. The lateral size of MoS2 sheets is about 100 nm and they are suspended vertically on TiO2 nanobelts which can expose high density of active sites. As shown, the MoS2 sheets are transparent, frizzle and flexible, demonstrating their ultrathin and layered structure . Indeed, the modification of TiO2 surface leads to the growth defects of MoS2. Many reports demonstrated that the defect-rich samples show more active edges and exhibit higher catalytic activity [28-31]. It is clearly indicated that there are more particles features on TiO2-NHH than others. In Figure 3(b), 3(d) and 3(f), for different post-treatments, the affected surface layer thickness are 16 nm, 10 nm and 7 nm, for TiO2-NH, TiO2-NHH, and TiO2-H surfaces, respectively. This implies the function of H2SO4 is to peel off some surface structure as agreed with above SEM observations.
Figure 3. Etching effect for different surface modification methods. TEM images of TiO2-NH (a), TiO2-NHH (b) and TiO2-H (c).
XPS was used to investigate the interface chemistry as well as the electronic structure of the synthesized heterostructures. The valence band of MoS2 is built up by the hybridization of Mo 4d and S 3p, which exhibits four major features within 0~10 eV. As shown in Figure 4, the electronic states of Mo 4 band is readily developed at ~2 eV. The higher binding energy Mo 4d - S 3p orbitals are overlapped with the substrate O 2p peaks. These observations indicate well-developed bands formation from hybridized Mo 4d - S 3p orbitals, which implies long-range in-plane ordering of the MoS2 structure. The core level spectra of Ti 2p peak from TiO2 substrate can be used as reference to align the valence band and core level spectra with/without MoS2 overlayers to determine the value of valence band offset at the MoS2/TiO2 interface. As shown in Figure 4(a), the leading edge of the valence band of bare TiO2 substrate and MoS2/TiO2-NH were determined to be 2.53 ± ± 0.05 eV and 0.17 ± 0.05 eV, respectively, by the intersection of the regression determined line segments defining the edge and the flat energy distribution curve in the energy gap region. Therefore, the valence band edge difference with and without MoS2 is used for determining the valence band offset (VBO) of MoS2/TiO2 system after aligning the Ti 2p peak position for both systems. Since the band gap of MoS2 is ~1.2 eV, the conduction band offset (CBO) at MoS2/TiO2 interface can be estimated. Applying the same method, VBO and CBO for TiO2-NHH and TiO2-H can also be determined.
Figure 4. Comparison of valence band of TiO2 nanobelts (black curve) and that after MoS2 growth (red curve). (a) for TiO2-NH, (b) for TiO2-NHH, and (c) for TiO2-H. (d) Schematic diagram of band alignment for MoS2/TiO2 heterostructures with different surface treatments.
The VBO and CBO information is schematically given in Figure 4(d). As shown clearly, type II band alignments are formed for all post-treated samples. In Figure 4(d), the VBO(CBO) gradually increases from 2.41(0.39) to 2.69(0.71) eV for TiO2-NH, TiO2-NHH and TiO2-H surfaces, respectively. This indicates that surface treatments play important roles to the interface electronic behaviors. As shown, when the surface is treated by H2SO4, the VBO increases due to the interface states. The change of VBO(CBO) can be partially due to the electron redistribution on the post-treated surfaces. Another reason is attributed to the interface interaction between MoS2 and TiO2 which puts the MoS2 bands at different energy level. This difference should affect their interface charge transport properties and thus the photocatalytic behaviors.
For H2SO4-treated surface, both VBO and CBO are the largest, the electrons and holes thus have largest possibility to separate. Therefore, its photocatalytic activities should be the best. In Figure 5, the photocatalytic activity measurements are presented. Our photocatalytic activity measurements show that MoS2/TiO2-H exhibits the best photocatalytic activity as compared to MoS2/TiO2-NH and MoS2/TiO2-NHH, which is in line with our band alignment arguments. Our results emphasize the importance of the interfacial engineering for the photocatalytic activities of MoS2/TiO2 composites. The superior photocatalytic activity of MoS2/TiO2-H could also be related to its more oxidized interface which leaves minimal recombination centers.
Figure 5. The photocatalytic performance of MoS2/TiO2 heterostructure.(a) MoS2/TiO2-NHH (b) MoS2/TiO2-NH (c) MoS2/TiO2-H. The degradation rate is given in (d).
The electrocatalytic performance was investigated using linear scan voltammetry in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution for the same amount of MoS2/TiO2 catalysts loaded on glassy carbon (GC) electrode (loading: ca. 0.285 mg/cm2). In general, higher acid or base concentration during the post-treatment will create more decorated features on the surfaces. In Figure 6(a), the electrocatalytic HER activities of different post-treated samples are given. It is immediately apparent from Figure 6(a) that the pure MoS2 powder shows poor HER activities and all the treated MoS2/TiO2 complexes exhibit better performance indicating the positive effect of interface engineering. In comparison, we also performed referential measurements using Pt electrocatalysts, which exhibited the highest HER electrocatalytic activity. The onset potential for MoS2/TiO2-NH, MoS2/TiO2-NHH and MoS2/TiO2-H are approximately 236 mV, 210 mV and 153 mV, respectively, which are comparable or better than that of the MoS2 nanosheets (ca. 160-250 mV) , CoP on carbon cloth (ca. 209 mV)  and cobalt-nitrogen-rich carbon nanotubes (ca. 360 mV) . Interestingly, the onset potential was found to decrease upon H2SO4 treatment. MoS2/TiO2-H exhibits the much enhanced HER performance with the highest cathodic current density as well as the lowest overpotential as compared to other treatments, see Figure 6(a). The current density for MoS2/TiO2-H is about 10 times higher than that of pure MoS2 powder.
Figure 6. Electrocatalytic performance of MoS2/TiO2 hybrids. (a) Polarization curves of various samples with different treatments as well as that of Pt and commercial MoS2 powder for comparison. (b) is the corresponding Tafel plots for (a).
The HER mechanism for MoS2 still remains inconclusive, while we can speculate the reaction based on the Tafel slope. In fact, it is more impressive that the Tafel slope of MoS2/TiO2-H is greatly reduced from 140.7 mV/dec to 66.9 mV/dec, which is well below that of 95 mV/dec reported for MoS2 nanoflakes on conductive substrate, PyC , and close to the so-far best reported value, ~40 mV/dec . The determination and interpretation of the Tafel slope are important for the elucidation of the elementary steps involved. The observed Tafel slope of 66.9 mV/dec in current work suggests increased accessible sites for hydrogen adsorption as is consisted with the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism put forward by Li et al. . As shown in SEM, the amount of surface defective features follow the trend of TiO2-NH < TiO2-NHH < TiO2-H, which is the same as the HER activities of their corresponding complexes. This indicates that the interface properties of MoS2/TiO2 are important in improving their catalytic activity. Our results show a steady decrease of Tafel slope for H2SO4-treated samples. This is likely attributed to the fact that H2SO4 creates greater density of defective sites, as observed in SEM measurements, which in turn provides a greater number of accessible sites for Hads.
It was reported that the effective electronic coupling between the oxide and MoS2 can also enhance the HER performance . Our TEM measurements show that MoS2 can strongly chemically bonded with TiO2. This intimate chemical bonding ensures the effective electronic coupling needed for high HER performance. Moreover, the trend of HER activities is consistent with our band structure alignment measurements where the MoS2/TiO2-H has the largest band offset warranting fast charge transport across the interface. As reported, the H2SO4 modified decreased the work function of TiO2 . This could also be accounted for the change of CBO. The improved HER activity should be strongly correlated to the fast electron transfer at the intimately bonded MoS2/TiO2 interface, which is favored by the largest CBO for MoS2/TiO2-H where stronger build-in electric field is introduced. This is also confirmed by the electrochemical impedance measurement. As shown in Figure 7, the comparison of Nyquist plots between MoS2 and MoS2/TiO2-H is given at the over-potential of 270 mV. As shown, in the same condition, the MoS2/TiO2-H complex exhibits a smaller charge transfer resistance (Rct, about 80 Ω v.s. 12 kΩ). The small Rct warrantees fast charge transfer at the interface, thus better electro-catalytic performance.
Figure 7. Electrochemical impedance measurement. Nyquist plots of commercial MoS2 (black squares) and MoS2/TiO2-H (red circles).
In summary, three different post-treated TiO2 nanobelts are prepared which all lead to strong chemical coupling of MoS2 with TiO2 although the nucleation sites are different. Type II band alignment is established for all samples. However, varied surface treatments play significant roles on the surface electron distribution at the interface which controls their band alignment. This band structure information can be used to explain their photocatalytic behaviors. The interface engineering shows important roles for HER with the MoS2/TiO2-H sample exhibiting the best performance. The high HER activity can be attributed to the synergistic effect of the defect-rich MoS2, effective electronic coupled interface as well as the interfacial build-in electric field for fast electron transfer.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11604074, 61674051), Hundred-Talent Program of Hebei Province (E2015100014), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China (E2016202023), and Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City (15JCYBJC52800).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
 H. Tan; A. Jain; O. Voznyy; X. Lan; F. P. G. de Arquer; J. Z. Fan; R. Quintero-Bermudez; M. Yuan; B. Zhang; Y. Zhao; F. Fan; P. Li; L. N. Quan; Y. Zhao; Z.-H. Lu; Z. Yang; S. Hoogland; E. H. Sargent, Efficient and stable solution-processed planar perovskite solar cells via contact passivation. Science. 355, 722 (2017). doi:10.1126/science.aai9081
 Y. Li; Y. Bian; H. Qin; Y. Zhang; Z. Bian, Photocatalytic reduction behavior of hexavalent chromium on hydroxyl modified titanium dioxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 206, 293 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.044
 R. Asahi; T. Morikawa; T. Ohwaki; K. Aoki; and Y. Taga, Visible-Light Photocatalysis in Nitrogen-Doped Titanium Oxides. Science. 293, 269 (2001). doi:10.1126/science.1061051
 J. Tao; T. Luttrell; M. Batzill, A two-dimensional phase of TiO2 with a reduced bandgap. Nature Chemistry. 3, 296 (2011). doi: 10.1038/nchem.1006
 M. Kong; Y. Li; X. Chen; T. Tian; P. Fang; F. Zheng; X. Zhao, Tuning the Relative Concentration Ratio of Bulk Defects to Surface Defects in TiO2 Nanocrystals Leads to High Photocatalytic Efficiency. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133, 16414 (2011). doi:10.1021/ja207826q
 X. Chen; L. Liu; P. Y. Yu; S. S. Mao, Increasing Solar Absorption for Photocatalysis with Black Hydrogenated Titanium Dioxide Nanocrystals. Science. 331, 746 (2011). doi:10.1126/science.1200448
 J. Tao; M. Yang; J. W. Chai; J. S. Pan; Y. P. Feng; S. J. Wang, Adsorption and Diffusion of CO2 and CH4 in Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8: Effect of Structural Flexibility. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 118, 994 (2014). doi:10.1021/jp500796e
 C. Xie; C. Mak; X. Tao; F. Yan, Photodetectors Based on Two-Dimensional Layered Materials Beyond Graphene. Advanced Functional Materials. 27, 1603886 (2017). doi:10.1002/adfm.201603886
 L. Yang; X.Z. Wang; Y. Liu; Z.F. Yu; J.J. Liang; B.B. Chen; C. Shi; S. Tian; X. Li; and J.S. Qiu, Monolayer MoS2 anchored on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for efficient hydrodesulfurization Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 200, 211 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.006
 Q. H. Wang; K. Kalantar-Zadeh; A. Kis; J. N. Coleman; M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotechnology. 7, 699 (2012). doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193
 S. B. Homan; V. K. Sangwan; I. Balla; H. Bergeron; E. A. Weiss; M. C. Hersam, Ultrafast Exciton Dissociation and Long-Lived Charge Separation in a Photovoltaic Pentacene–MoS2 van der Waals Heterojunction. Nano Letters. 17, 164 (2017). doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03704
 S. Kanda; T. Akita; M. Fujishima; H. Tada, Facile synthesis and catalytic activity of MoS2/TiO2 by a photodeposition-based technique and its oxidized derivative MoO3/TiO2 with a unique photochromism. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 354, 607 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.11.007
 L. Zheng; S. Han; H. Liu; P. Yu; X. Fang, Hierarchical MoS2 Nanosheet@TiO2 Nanotube Array Composites with Enhanced Photocatalytic and Photocurrent Performances. Small. 12, 1527 (2016). doi:10.1002/smll.201503441
 C. Tang; W. Xu; C. Chen; Y. Li; L. Xu, Unraveling the Orientation of MoS2 on TiO2 for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Advanced Materials Interfaces. 4, 1700361 (2017). doi: 10.1002/admi.201700361
 J. Tao; J. Chai; L. Guan; J. Pan; S. Wang, Effect of interfacial coupling on photocatalytic performance of large scale MoS2/TiO2 hetero-thin films. Applied Physics Letters. 106, 081602 (2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4913662
 L. Cao; R. Wang; D. Wang; L. Xu; X. Li, Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity for the hybrid MoS2/anatase TiO2(0 0 1) nanocomposite: A first-principles study. Chemical Physics Letters. 612, 285 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2014.08.048
 W. Zhou; Z. Yin; Y. Du; X. Huang; Z. Zeng; Z. Fan; H. Liu; J. Wang; H. Zhang, Synthesis of Few-Layer MoS2 Nanosheet-Coated TiO2 Nanobelt Heterostructures for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities. Small. 9, 140 (2013). doi:10.1002/smll.201201161
 M. Shen; Z. Yan; L. Yang; P. Du; J. Zhang; B. Xiang, MoS2 nanosheet/TiO2 nanowire hybrid nanostructures for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities. Chemical Communications. 50, 15447 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4CC07351G
 D. Xiang; C. Han; J. Wu; S. Zhong; Y. Liu; J. Lin; X.A. Zhang; W. Ping Hu; B. Ozyilmaz; A. H. C. Neto; A. T. S. Wee; W. Chen, Surface transfer doping induced effective modulation on ambipolar characteristics of few-layer black phosphorus. Nature Communications. 6, 6485 (2015). doi:10.1038/ncomms7485
 Y. Zhu; Q. Ling; Y. Liu; H. Wang; Y. Zhu, Photocatalytic H2 evolution on MoS2–TiO2 catalysts synthesized via mechanochemistry. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 17, 933 (2015). doi:10.1039/C4CP04628E
 S. Cravanzola; L. Muscuso; F. Cesano; G. Agostini; A. Damin; D. Scarano; A. Zecchina, MoS2 Nanoparticles Decorating Titanate-Nanotube Surfaces: Combined Microscopy, Spectroscopy, and Catalytic Studies. Langmuir. 31. 5469 (2015). doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00396
 Q. Liu; Z. Pu; A. M. Asiri; A. H. Qusti; A. O. Al-Youbi; X. Sun, One-step solvothermal synthesis of MoS2/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic H2 production. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 15,2057 (2013). doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2057-8
 X. Liu; X. Huo; P. Liu; Y. Tang; J. Xu; X. Liu; Y. Zhou, Assembly of MoS2 nanosheet-TiO2 nanorod heterostructure as sensor scaffold for photoelectrochemical biosensing. Electrochimica Acta. 242, 327 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.037
 B. J. Guo; K. Yu; H. L. Li; H. L. Song; Y. Y. Zhang; X. Lei; H. Fu; Y. H. Tan; Z. G. Zhu, Hollow Structured Micro/Nano MoS2 Spheres for High Electrocatalytic Activity Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 8, 5517 (2016). doi:10.1021/acsami.5b10252
 X. Zhao; H. Zhua; X. R. Yang, Amorphous carbon supported MoS2 nanosheets as effective catalysts for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale. 6, 10680 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4NR01885K
 H. Nolan; N. McEvoy; M. O’Brien; N. C. Berner; C. Yim; T. Hallam; A. R. McDonald; G. S. Duesberg, Molybdenum disulfide/pyrolytic carbon hybrid electrodes for scalable hydrogen evolution. Nanoscale. 6, 8185 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4NR01528B
 Y. Yu; S.Y. Huang; Y. Li; S. N. Steinmann; W. Yang; L. Cao, Layer-Dependent Electrocatalysis of MoS2 for Hydrogen Evolution . Nano Letters. 14, 553 (2014). doi:10.1021/nl403620g
 J. Deng; W. Yuan; P. Ren; Y. Wang; D. Deng; Z. Zhang; X. Bao, High-performance hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis by layer-controlled MoS2 nanosheets. RSC Advances. 4, 34733 (2014). doi: 10.1039/C4RA05614K
 J. F. Xie; H. Zhang; S. Li; R. X. Wang; X. Sun; M. Zhou; J. F. Zhou; X. W. Lou; Y. Xie, Defect-Rich MoS2 Ultrathin Nanosheets with Additional Active Edge Sites for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Advanced Materials. 25, 5807 (2013). doi: 10.1002/adma.201302685
 B. Hinnemann; P. G. Moses; J. Bonde; K. P. Jørgensen; J. H. Nielsen; S. Horch; I. Chorkendorff; J. K. Nørskov, Biomimetic Hydrogen Evolution: MoS2 Nanoparticles as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 127, 5308 (2005). doi:10.1021/ja0504690
 T. F. Jaramillo; K. P. Jørgensen; J. Bonde; J. H. Nielsen; S. Horch; I. Chorkendorff, Identification of Active Edge Sites for Electrochemical H2 Evolution from MoS2 Nanocatalysts. Science 317, 100 (2007). doi:10.1126/science.1141483
 K. Chang and W. Chen, l-Cysteine-Assisted Synthesis of Layered MoS2/Graphene Composites with Excellent Electrochemical Performances for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Nano. 5, 4720 (2011). doi:10.1021/nn200659w
 W. J. Zhou; H. Liu; J. Y. Wang; D. Liu; G. J. Du; J. J. Cui, Ag2O/TiO2 Nanobelts Heterostructure with Enhanced Ultraviolet and Visible Photocatalytic Activity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2, 2385 (2010). doi:10.1021/am100394x
 C. B. Liu; L. L. Wang; Y. H. Tang; S. L. Luo; Y. T. Liu; S. Q. Zhang; Y. X. Zeng; Y. Z. Xu, Vertical single or few-layer MoS2 nanosheets rooting into TiO2 nanofibers for highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 164, 1 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.046
 J. Tian; Q. Liu; A. M. Asiri; X. Sun, Self-Supported Nanoporous Cobalt Phosphide Nanowire Arrays: An Efficient 3D Hydrogen-Evolving Cathode over the Wide Range of pH 0–14. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136, 7587 (2014). doi:10.1021/ja503372r
 X. Zou; X. Huang; A. Goswami; R. Silva; B. R. Sathe; E. Mikmeková; T. Asefa, Cobalt-Embedded Nitrogen-Rich Carbon Nanotubes Efficiently Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution Reaction at All pH Values. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 53, 4372 (2014). doi:10.1002/anie.201311111
 Y. Li; H. Wang; L. Xie; Y. Liang; G. Hong; H. Dai, MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133, 7296 (2011). doi:10.1021/ja201269b
 A. Imanishi; E. Tsuji; Y. Nakato, Dependence of the Work Function of TiO2 (Rutile) on Crystal Faces, Studied by a Scanning Auger Microprobe. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 111, 2128 (2007). doi:10.1021/jp0668403
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
© The Author(s) 2017